Nye was born on November 27, 1955, in Washington, D.C., to Jacqueline (née Jenkins; 1921–2000), a code breaker during World War II, and Edwin Darby "Ned" Nye (1917–97), also a World War II veteran, whose experience without electricity in a Japanese prisoner of war camp led him to become a sundial enthusiast. His maternal grandmother was French, from Dancevoir.
Nye began his career in Seattle at Boeing, where (among other things) he starred in training films and developed a hydraulic pressure resonance suppressor for the Boeing 747. Later, he worked as a consultant in the aeronautics industry. In 1999 he told the St. Petersburg Times that he applied to be a NASA astronaut every few years, but was always rejected.
Nye began his professional entertainment career as a writer/actor on a local sketch comedytelevision show in Seattle, Washington, called Almost Live!. The host of the show, Ross Shafer, suggested he do some scientific demonstrations in a six-minute segment, and take on the nickname "The Science Guy". His other main recurring role on Almost Live! was as Speedwalker, a speed walking Seattle superhero.
Now, that is enough about Mr. Nye and some of his background. If you read the above you see no evidence or referral to Nye being a “science educated” person. But as a speaker at universities here is a recent statement he made.
"We have almost 7.3 billion people breathing and burning an atmosphere, which is, in the planetary scheme of things, quite shallow. We all share the same air. That's why our climate is changing. Denying it is in no one's best interest. If you know any climate deniers, I'm sorry. But, try asking them this question: 'Do you believe that it's a conspiracy of health professionals that is duping the world into believing that cigarette smoking causes cancer?' The scientific consensus on climate change is at least as strong as the consensus on smoking. Climate change is a real deal. So, hey deniers — cut it out, and let's get to work." —Bill Nye to Rutgers University graduates
Now you know why we have such brilliant graduates coming out of our colleges. So let’s cut to the chase and see what real science says about Global Warming or as they now refer to it as “Climate Change”, both lies as you will see.
John Casey: Climate Change 'Greatest Scientific Fraud in History'
Wednesday, 17 Dec 2014 06:07 PM
By Courtney Coren
The climate change theory that man-made global warming is caused by an increase of greenhouse gases "is the greatest scientific fraud in history," says John Casey, president of the Space and Science Research Corporation.
"If you go back and look at how all this got started and look at the 30 years and the $30 billion [spent] in an attempt to make what's always been a weak scientific theory into something valid, we now know after all that effort, money and time, that the greenhouse gas theory as shown in the UN's own climate models has been a miserable failure in predicting climate change," Casey told J.D. Hayworth and Francesca Page on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TV Wednesday.
Especially, he says, when "compared with solar cycles" that he uses to predict climate change, "which are over 90 percent accurate."
He contends that it's hard to believe "why so many people believe in a theory that has been proven to be so unreliable versus models that are very reliable."
Casey is the author of "Dark Winter: How the Sun Is Causing a 30-Year Cold Spell," which was released in September.
The president of the Space and Science Research Corporation says he came to the conclusion that we are headed for a 30-year cold spell by looking "at measurements of the sun's behavior."
He says that he and his team looked at "24 different climate related parameters and especially the sun, which is the primary cause of climate change.
"By properly looking at the various components of solar activity, we have been able to discern the key cycles that schedule climate change, and we have made substantial headway in making highly reliable predictions based on that model," he explained.
"The answer to that is this is all a part of the natural cycles of the sun," he contends.
Casey says that the latest Global Climate Status Report released by the Space and Science Research Corporation, includes "a study of solar activity for the last two major cold eras [which] has shown that this particular warming event is the last 'hora of the sun,' if you will, and is a primary indicator that we're about to fall off a global climate temperature cliff into the new cold era."
"There is an average line of 18 years long where there's been no effective increase in global temperature," he explained.
"In fact, based on our models, we're showing a global cooling phase and as our last climate report indicates of the 24 parameters, 15 are showing global cooling as the primary climate trend," he added.
MORE ON SO CALLED “GLOBAL WARMING” MANTRA & LIES
Editor’s note: I have researched some articles on the “Global Warming” lie and have found some other fascinating information with referrals to NASA and the EPA in the text.
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Monday, June 23, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
NaturalNews) When drug companies are caught faking clinical trial data, no one is surprised anymore. When vaccine manufacturers spike their human trial samples with animal antibodies to make sure their vaccines appear to work, we all just figure that's how they do business: lying, cheating, deceiving and violating the law.
Now, in what might be the largest scientific fraud ever uncovered, NASA and the NOAA have been caught red-handed altering historical temperature data to produce a "climate change narrative" that defies reality. This finding, originally documented on the Real Science website, is detailed here.
We now know that historical temperature data for the continental United States were deliberately altered by NASA and NOAA scientists in a politically-motivated attempt to rewrite history and claim global warming is causing U.S. temperatures to trend upward. The data actually show that we are in a cooling trend, not a warming trend (see charts below).
This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting (1), "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Here's the proof of the climate change fraud
Here's the chart of U.S. temperatures published by NASA in 1999. It shows the highest temperatures actually occurred in the 1930's, followed by a cooling trend ramping downward to the year 2000:
After the Obama administration took office, however, and started pushing the global warming narrative for political purposes, NASA was directed to alter its historical data in order to reverse the cooling trend and show a warming trend instead. This was accomplished using climate-modeling computers that simply fabricated the data the researchers wished to see instead of what was actually happening in the real world.
Using the exact same data found in the chart shown above (with a few years of additional data after 2000), NASA managed to misleadingly distort the chart to depict the appearance of global warming:
This new, altered chart shows that historical data -- especially the severe heat and droughts experienced in the 1930's -- are now systematically suppressed to make them appear cooler than they really were. At the same time, temperature data from the 1970's to 2010 are strongly exaggerated to make them appear warmer than they really were.
This is a clear case of scientific fraud being carried out on a grand scale in order to deceive the entire world about global warming.
EPA data also confirm the global warming hoaxWhat's even more interesting is that even the EPA's "Heat Wave Index" data further support the notion that the U.S. was far hotter in the 1930's than it is today.
The following chart, published on the EPA.gov website (4), clearly shows modern-day heat waves are far smaller and less severe than those of the 1930's. In fact, the seemingly "extreme" heat waves of the last few years were no worse than those of the early 1900's or 1950's.
Editor’s note: Remember this is the same agency that is closing coal mine and power plants because of so called air pollution.
Seeing these charts, you might wonder how the extremely high temperatures of the 1930's came about.Were we releasing too much CO2 by burning fossil fuels?
Nope. That entire episode of massive warming and drought was caused by conventional agricultural practices that clear-cut forests, poisoned the soils with chemicals and plowed the top soil away. Lacking trees to retain moisture, areas that were once thriving plains, grasslands and forests turned to desert. Suddenly, the cooling effects of moisture transpiration from healthy plant ecosystems was lost, causing extreme temperatures and deadly drought.
Shortsighted agricultural practices, in other words, really did cause "warming," while a restoration of a more natural ecosystem reversed the trend and cooled the region.
Reforestation is (and was) the answer
This brings us to the simple, obvious solution to all this. If you want to cool the planet, focus on reforestation efforts. If you want to retain moisture and keep your soils alive, you need diverse plant-based ecosystems, not clear-cut fields running monoculture operations.
Forests act like sponges that soak up rainwater, and then they turn around and slowly release that water back into the air, "moisturizing" the atmosphere and keeping humidity levels high enough to support other nearby grasses, shrubs and plants. When you clear-cut forests -- as has been done all across the world to make room for mechanized agriculture -- you effectively raise temperatures by eliminating nature's plant-based water retention and cooling systems.
Industrialized farming, in other words, has already been historically shown to radically increase continental temperatures and "warm" the region. So why isn't the White House warning the world about the dangers of industrialized agriculture?
The answer: Because it doesn't accomplish anything that's politically important to this administration. It's far more important to use the false panic of global warming to shut down clean coal power plants (U.S. coal plants are FAR cleaner than China's) and drive the population into a state of subservient obedience through doomsday scare tactics.